The Us Military Tanks: A Comparison of Capabilities with Argentine and British Forces

The Argentine tank, also known as the TAM, is a formidable piece of military equipment that weighs in at just 30 tons, compared to the much heavier Challenger 2, which tips the scales at 62 tons. While the TAM may lack the firepower of its British counterpart, it has been effective in combat, with over 200 tanks equipping two brigades.

However, when comparing the capabilities of Argentine and British forces, it is clear that there are significant differences between the two nations' military capabilities. For example, Argentina lacks the transport and logistical capacity to deploy and sustain heavy forces over long distances and spans of time. This was evident during the 1982 Falklands War, in which British forces were able to cross thousands of miles of open ocean and engage and defeat an Argentine force.

In contrast, the British army is well-equipped to deploy its armored brigades over long distances and sustain them indefinitely, according to a report by the California think-tank RAND. In fact, just recently, 5,500 British troops with 180 armored vehicles, including eight Challenger 2s, deployed to Oman for a combined-arms war game.

Another key difference between Argentine and British forces is their ability to practice deploying tanks over long distances aboard amphibious and transport ships. This training is crucial in preparing tankers for high-intensity warfare alongside infantry, artillery, and air power. And while the Challenger 2 may not be the most advanced tank on the market, it has proven itself to be an effective piece of military equipment.

In conclusion, while Argentine forces have their limitations, British forces are well-equipped to deploy and sustain heavy forces over long distances and spans of time. The US military tanks, including the Challenger 2, demonstrate this capability, making them a formidable force on the battlefield.

Us military tanks